News

THE MYTHOLOGY OF A 1.76 CRORE LOSS

THE MYTHOLOGY OF A 176,000 CRORE LOSS

By Sanjay Jha

On Tehelka and http://www.HamaraCongress.com

( The apparent difference is just a measly Rs 173,355 crores between the earlier inflated allegations of financial loss in 2G scam and the new figure in circulation of Rs 2645 crores . How come such a gargantuan ruse was pulled over our naked eyes by CAG ??? The extraordinary manipulation of a mythical loss).

In Washington they say that even a dog refuses to be a man’s best friend. The poor canine sniffs trouble interspersed all around him. Conspiracy theories, palace intrigue and internecine feuds are considered commonplace and customary conditions in most political capitals of the world. Delhi is no exception. There is always something uncannily sinister in the dark corridors of power; its stealthy political one-upmanship accentuated by the imperceptible influence of corporate rivalries, raw media power, lobbyists and odd assortment of power-brokers.

Last week in Delhi someone told me in deadly earnest what has been often rumored that the Sangh Parivaar has insidiously infiltrated into key organs of our democratic institutions. I am not making any innuendos, but the CAG’s remarkable promptitude in publicly pronouncing the 2G scam numbers at a mind-boggling 1.76 lakh crore indeed raises more than mere suspicious eyebrows especially now that it is known that RP Singh , Director-General ( audit , post and telecommunications) had a comparatively pygmy-like figure of Rs 2645 crores ascribed to the supposed policy contraventions. According to Singh, the only missing factor was overlooking cost escalation on account of inflation-indexing. But the 2G report almost threatened the very existence of a democratically elected government, led to the rise of extreme extra-constitutional forces on an anti-corruption crusade , besides systematically decimating a beleaguered coalition at the helm. We are talking serious business here. CAG chief Vinod Rai needs to explain the exaggerated 80 times multiple that he assiduously postulated as damages, when his own principal investigator had a contrary opinion.

To understand the 2 G scam though , we need to sub-divide the core issues in the imbroglio:

1) Presumptive loss is a notional figure where financial impact is measured on certain assumptions. The fundamental aspect therefore is the reasonableness, validity and foreseeable actuality of those assumptions. If the assumptions themselves are seriously flawed, the figures may be grossly exaggerated making the entire debate ridiculously skewed.

2) To understand the erroneousness of CAG’s estimations, we have to go back to the basics on which this monstrous mythical figure of 176,000 crores made its formidable debut. Even companies like Swan and Unitech that got the spectrum at arguably cheaper prices, issued fresh shares to foreign buyers to create a joint venture as opposed to earning capital gains on promoter equity dilution. Thus, the respective companies gained fresh equity capital for company operations/expansion as opposed to private profiteering, even if the promoter stake naturally fell corresponding to value of fresh equity offerings. But were these transactional financial deals good enough to be construed as potential market value of 2 G spectrum ? The answer is NO, and has been further explained below. Of course, it can be alleged that the companies benefited from the unusually high valuations giving them undue competitive advantage.

3) By the same criteria, how can S Tel’s offer for a pan-Indian license also be a benchmark for evaluating the loss ( it was also subsequently withdrawn) . These are corporate decisions based on company’s assessment of the telecom market, their global footprint, shareholder value projections and capital capacity. Sure, it is market forces at play but it has the major drawback of adopting a transactional approach, as it is prone to the subjective judgment of just a few corporate entities that may have no practical universal application. Let us take an example; supposing I volunteer to purchase property from the GOI at some ridiculously exorbitant rate, can that become an acceptable “ benchmark” for other similar investors??? I may have made a grievous miscalculation or been highly bullish, or had ulterior motives; should other genuine investors pay a hefty price for it??

4) I am flabbergasted as to how a crucial element of telecom valuations was casually camouflaged ; 2G and 3 G are vastly different technology platforms. With faster downloads, broadband wireless, video streaming, mobile TV, e-banking happening on handheld instruments, 3G is a technological leap, like a mammoth metamorphosis. 3G is for India’s young urban middle class consuming mobile on the move; a high-value premium service for a niche affluent consumer . With mobile expansion slowing down, telecom operators see higher per user revenue realization from 3G , hence the successful auction war for it. Can we compare the brute power of BMW SUV with that of a Nano just because they are both four-wheelers??? The CAG argument is not just seriously blemished , it defies elementary common-sense expected of a first-year commerce student.

5) Thus, the estimation of loss itself has taken several forms simply because it is subject to myriad interpretations based on subjective assumptions. An auction reflects price-discovery, the market sentiment at a given point of time which can drastically change overnight. That’s why the CBI has got its own version of Rs 30985 crores ; it tells you the absence of an acceptable common determinant for projecting profits/ losses on 2G spectrum sale, and that too, with retrospective effect.

6) The problem as usual lay in the outlandish execution by the former Telecom Minister Raja which clearly appeared disputable . But the policy per se could not be faulted. Incidentally, the first come first served policy was consistent with the GOI’s objective of increasing tele-density . Raising large public revenues can easily contravene the key objective of affordable access of mobile services for the common man, as telecom operators would pass the higher cost to unsuspecting consumers. .You cannot decouple the two innately conflicting objectives. That in short is the simplest explanation for the telecom scam. A fine balancing act on a slippery tight-rope was always going to be difficult exacerbated by the fact that telecom pricing was in an evolving market with no historical precedence.

7) Ideally, Raja should have arrived at a “ fair price” taking into account multiple factors when he issued those controversial 122 licenses. Even the cost index inflation was inadequate. Ideally, one should have considered the growth in telecom business/users ( the number of users had increased to 280 million in 2008), falling tariff rate, cost of capital, extent of investment, employment opportunities, projected profitability, and unexplored market potential. The truth is that spectrum pricing/ allocation is a complex math as it is an intangible asset with significant hidden monetary value. Governments usually lack the financial engineering skills needed for litigation free fund raising. Giving the telecom minister a virtual license ( pun intended) to determine pricing was always a risky proposition.

.

8) I think the core focus should be on whether there was a willful criminal conspiracy to manipulate regulations to defraud the exchequer to favor select parties. Because the fact is that whether it was Rs 176000 or Rs 2645 crores it is still not small change. But why did Vinod Rai’s CAG office leak the report before it reached Parliament ? Who authorized it? To use the same argument of the BJP on cash for votes,, who was the real beneficiary of the CAG fissures ? That is where the real story lies. Why was an obstructionist attitude demonstrated towards one of its own key investigators? The BJP may have chuckled with sadistic delight at Kapil Sibal’s zero-loss proposition, but as of now it is Sibal who is perhaps having the last laugh.

The CAG it seems applied too much lotion to a notion to keep it in motion and hurl it into a commotion. It’s not over yet.

Advertisements

7 Comments on THE MYTHOLOGY OF A 1.76 CRORE LOSS

  1. satish mishra // October 7, 2011 at 7:03 am // Reply

    Dear Mr. Writer congratulations for giving new height to the tradition of trading/spreading falsehood. I am sure, the Congress Party will give you the best & the biggest “Reward”.for your’s this great service of corrupts & corruption. Your article is the great example, that in our country even today there are thousands of jaichands & mir jaafars like you.

  2. Can you please explain why so many people from politicians to corporate honchos are languishing in jail? Why Supreme Court is monitoring the 2G scam? Are you challenging the wisdom of SC? 2G spectrum allocation became scam not because of financial aspect but for collusive corruption of politicians and businessmen. Top leaders of Congress including PM, Sonia Gandhi, Chidambaram did nothing to stop the corruption. CBI estimated the loss as 30,000 crore which is mind boggling. Even if I assume that the loss is 2,645 crore, it is good enough for PM, Raja, Chidambaram and others to be in the jail.

    • votecongress // October 7, 2011 at 9:46 am // Reply

      You missed the point! I have written that companies did benefit by getting better valuations as it lowered their cost of capital, which was an unfair advantage. Plus, there must be evidence of collusion. Thus, one has condemned the wrong practise. But the figure of 1.76 crores looks out of the top.

  3. Binu Shajan // October 8, 2011 at 6:52 am // Reply

    I think the damage has been done already by the initial CAG figure. No one is going to buy this new figure of 2465 crores when CBI itself predicted about 30K crores loss. Two key facts were not highlighted by the spokespersons and the congress ended up loosing the media battle on 2G. In addition, the media took a completely one sided view on the issue as it gave them more sensationalism. 1) If the spectrum was auctioned, new service providers will have to pay a higher price for the spectrum and they have to compete with the existing service providers who had to pay much less and hence there is no level playing field. 2) If the spectrum was auctioned, the service providers will pass the increased cost to the consumers and hence the call rates will go up instead of the tele-density that has shot up due to low call rates in India. I gives me joy to see a poor with a cellphone in hand and that is purely because of the dead cheap call rates. It is actually very easy to defend and sell the non-auction policy by highlighting these 2 points. Instead UPA ended up beating around the bush trying to pass the buck from 1 ministry to the other.

  4. Chandra Shekhar // November 15, 2011 at 5:43 am // Reply

    *Kill the SIN n not the SINNER … if there is a LOSS to the exchequer than accept it n return
    the Losses to the NATION with dignity, no matter the guilty is punished or not, its for the COURTS to decide …!!!

    reg.,

    Chandra Shekhar

  5. Sanjay, Alas if it was as simple we would have seen the luminaries of the congress running amok in the media and stating these “facts”.

    BTW what took you so long to conclude why this figure of 1.76 lakh crore was a myth? CAG report was in public demain for nearly an year. But as long as the heat was on DMK the figure was acceptable, but now that the laws of the hands are nearing Congress top leadership, suddenly this piece appears. Draw your own conclusions.

    As for tweet about B. Com. Finance doing such audits, all I would say is the CAG is more than qualifies and knows what he is talking about. Rather than taking potshots, refer to that report, quote it and then try to prove if the facts stated in the CAG report are wrong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: